C 86)

IV. Mar. vii. 15. But that "which originally 1

proceeds from the Man is what defileshim.

The Greek has nothing that answers to theWord originally. Nor is it certainly true, thatthe Enormities here meant do proceed originallyfrom the Man.

V. Mar. ix. 1 2. It was predicted of him, as

well as of the Son of Man , that he JJmddfitfifer very mitch y &c.

The Original fays nothing about Ellas's Sufferingsbeing predicted: Nor perhaps in Fact were suchThings ever predicted. In the following Verse in-deed, according to the Order of the Words, sucha Thing seems to be asserted. But it is a Metathe-sis, and our Interpreter gives the Words their duePlace in his Version, and thereby preVents theirbeing thus taken. Now if Elias's Sufferings hadbeen foretold, why did he transpose, the Wordsin the. 13 th Ver. which naturally denote as much.If those Sufferings had not been foretold, howmuch is he to blame, who adds such a Falflioodto the 12th Verse.

VI. Mar. xii. 2 5. When they shall rife from the-

Dead, they neither will marry nor begiven in Marriage , but be immortal, (fie.

As if Marriage was inconsistent with an im-mortal State; and as if Adam and Eve were notmarried before they became mortal: But Im-mortal is the Interpreter s own Addition.

VIE