( 37 )

PART II,

Wherein the Objections advanced by theAnnotator on the New Testament late-ly published in Greek and English ,and by the Author of the Discourse onthe Revelations ascribed to St. John,against the Argument from Tradition ,are considered and refuted.

Introduction.Concerning the State of the Argument fromTradition, and the Qualities requiredin Witnefses to the Fact under presentConsideration.

T T was natural to expect, that the AdversariesI to the Genuineness of the Revelations , wouldlay down those Rules by which learned Men havebeen used to detect supposititious Books, and fromthem evince, that it is falsely ascribed to St. Johnthe Evangelist. But instead of this, they havecontented themselves with an Attack upon a sin-gle Argument for the Genuineness of the Apoca-lypstt that from Traditign. Upon an Enumera-tion

?