^hœnomenon of Dreaming. 219

the difference between them, because,

, a state of separation, the last sort will beJt hout impediment.

j J^X. Now from this account of memory"Ould follow, that every new impression^ a de on the sensory, ought to appear new° soul: and yet we fee it is otherwise• 7 1 respect to the impressions made by thesel bble agents. It is one thing to fee in, Ce P persons, quorum tellus ampleBitur ossaLucretius expresses it) alive and before' With whom we are once acquainted;

% io d ne miremursopor at que oblivia cur ant;

^uite another to fee persons, who ontlr being presented for the very first time ,j £>miliar to us, and seem to have hadin[ t ^ er concerns with us; to jump all at oncerie ° a train of former aBion, which we werePar' 1 Conc er n ed in; and to become instantly, of a traB of experience^ which we

de r r acc pured ! This is the most won-th‘ U a Ppenrance, I think, in nature. No-§ but the actions of the Deity (whichf 0j _, a ^^ire, but do not pretend to account' can exceed it. But whatever this may