A treatise of Algebra. iji
Terms of a decreasing geometrical Progression, the Sumof that Progression infinitely continued, or the Value ofp, will, according to this Supposition, be truly repre-a z e z a 1 !
fented by-- or-- (see p. 72 .) whence we
ae — be z a — be
( pd V
—- I
a 1 -j- pbf
pb
Now though the Suppontion, by virtue
a -f- ~
1 a ■-
whereof this Conclusion is derived, is not strictly true,yet when the Value of e is small, which is here supposedto be the Case, the pirror arising therefrom will be very
a z e
inconsiderable, since the Expression- takes in the
a — be
two first Terms of the Series intirely and participates ofthe rest. But if you would have a Theorem whichshall take in the three first Terms,"fa’s. then let the said
are . - , b z e*
Expression-, cr it's E^ual qr -s- He 2 -j-fa’s. be
a — be , a
subtracted from the given Expression ae -j- be 1 -j- rr3,' ' hz
(3c. and the Remainder c -x *3, (3 c. will Ihew how
a
a z e , _ a z e
much-is below the Truth ; that is-[*
a — be 1 a — be
b z J 2
f- X e3, £sV. — p But, since c — — x *3 13c.
a a
a z e
appears to be very small in respect of-, and e is
a — be
p p
found above to be nearly —-or — ( which last
Value is sufficiently exact for our present Purpose) letp z
be substituted instead of f 2 , in that Expression, andI, a our