The I -N

they are more likely to be Roman. 182.Danes, in Opposition to Charleton,shewn to be barbarous in Art. x 94.Danes not Founders of the anti-quated Danish Monuments, 197.the Doctor's Notion about the Da-nish Inauguratory near Lundy, ex-.,amined. ipf, 196. All his Danislibarbarous Monuments have no Ana-logy with Stone-Heng. 196. someAccount of the Election of the Da-nish Kings. 196, 197. the Doctorcharged with many Contradictionsabout the Danish Inauguration. 198,199. he has produced no Monumentpeculiar to the Danes, any where butwithin their own Dominions. 199.the Ancients superfluous in comme-morating the Actions of the Danes.207. and why not Stone-Heng?206.. their Barbarity, ib. Charle-ton’s Account of the Danes gettinghuge Stones together-, &c. exploded.211,212. his Rodomontades aboutthem. 213. asserts they were notso rude as to want the life of En-gines. 216. remark'd upon. 217,2.18. Summary of Arguments toevince the Danes could not be theAuthors of Stone-Heng. 219. Mr.JonesV Opinion , probably wall'd a-bout. 220. A Recapitulation of theDoctor's Opinion about the Timewhen the Danes erected Stone-Heng. 220,221. his Opponent re-cites that Part of the Danish His-tory hereupon. 221, 222. Danesmassacred , Sec. 223. his Opinionabout that Erection examined. 224.that the Danish Camp affirm'd bythe Doctor to be not far from Stone-Heng, refuted. 224. that they hadnow over-run King Alfredo wholeKingdom , &c. false. 227. thatthey lay at Edinton but five Months,so that it was impossible for them toerect Stone-Heng. 226. no Re-mains of Danish Edifices in theKingdom , and why. 228. DanishKings crown'd here after the SaxonManner. 228. Kongstolen andother Monuments in Denmark notpeculiar to the Danes, but of all An-tiquity. 192. these stony Places forElecting of Kings were not erectedby the Danes, but Cimbrians, Da-cians, Goths, &c. W.

Decorum, what it is in. Architecture.24 w.

Delubrum, an ancient Term, explain'd.118 W.

D E X.

Designs of Stone-Heng. 42, of. aMonopteros. f4, 77. of a Peripte -res. 76 J. the Art of Designingbrought in Use in Engiand by Mr.Jones. 19. flighted by some. ib.W.

Diana, her Temples and Worship. 60.Stone-Heng not sacred to her. ib.and 60,61,6z J.

Diastylos, a Term in ancient Archi-tecture, explain'd. 42. more of it.71 W.

Diminution of Columns in Architec-ture consider'd. 34,3s, 36W.

Dipteros Hypæthros, a Term in an-cient Architecture. 70 J. more ofDipteros, &c. 67, 66. more of it.114,117 W.

Druids, some Account of them. z.Stone-Heng not built by them, andthe Reasons of it. 3. their ancientWay of living, ibid. Mela’r Ac-count of them. ibid. what theirTemples were. 4. their ancient Seatin Mona, now Anglesey, ib. theyhad properly no Temples. 7. noSkill in Building. 9 J.

E.

Dindon. 222 W.

Egyptians, the Introducers of &new and strange Kind of monumentalMagnificence, z W.

Ermin-street, a Roman Highway, andits Course. 60 J.

Eustylos, a Term in ancient Architec-ture, explain’d. 42 W.

Exmore, mighty Stones there with oneInscription. 82, 83 W.

F.

Anum, an ancient Term, explain'd.

118W.

Foss-way, a Roman Highway and itsCourse. 60 J.

G.

G Aul, describ'd by Cæsar. 9 J.

Germans, their ancient Wor -

ship. 7 J-

Greeks, their ancient Monuments .

3W.

H.

H A raid Hyldetand, a DanishKing, his Monument described »

31,32c.

z Hassel-