Buch 
An Encyclopaedia of civil engineering : historical, theoretical and practical : illustrated by upwards of three thousend engravings on wood by R. Branston / by E. Cresy
Entstehung
Seite
486
JPEG-Download
 

48 6

HISTOllY OF ENGINEERING.

Book I.

and more light and open as in the design, so as to bring the loading in those parts as nearto the equilibrium weight as the strength and stability of the iron frames will permit.

Mr. J. Rennie observed, that different methods may be adopted of rendering the archequally strong throughout. It may be balanced by the weight of the frames and loadingcharged on them towards the extremities so as to counterbalance that at the crown of thearch, or it may partly be done by weight, and partly by longitudinal braces placed in sucha direction as to answer the same purpose. The latter method will be found very usefulin this arch, particularly if put in addition to the weight which forms the equilibrio, for, asI apprehend, it will be impossible to prevent the iron from yielding in some degree; thisyielding will be greatest where the depths of the materials are least, which is at the crownof the arch, in which cases the braces will act in opposition to it, with more effect than thesimple gravity of whatever load may be placed upon it.

Mr. Attwood stated that the distribution of weight among the sections, so as to form anarch of equilibration, depends on the angles of the sections which form the entire arch. Ifthe angles should be equal, and of the magnitude stated, the weight of each section and thepressure on it appears from calculation to be as set forth in the table which follows. Thedimensions of the proposed bridge being

Height of the middle arch - - - - 65 feet.

Span ------- GOO

Radius - - - 724*8

Number of wedges which form the arch - - 63

Angle of each wedge or section - 46' 34"*314.

The inclination of the successive abutments to the vertical line is calculated from theangle of each section, 4G'34' / *314, a degree of exactness not necessary, except to prevent thesmall errors from accumulating. The angles of the abutments, entered in the second columnof the table, are expressed to the nearest minute of a degree. The weight of the highest ormiddle section, denoted by the letter A, is assumed equal to unity, the weight of all theother sections being in proportion to it.

Sections.

Angular Distances ofthe Abutments fromthe Vertical Line.

Wcightsofthe Sections.

Pressure on the Sec-tions next following.

Sums of the Weights ofthe Sections, deductingthe Weight of half thefirst Section.

A

0*23'

1*000

73*82

*500

B

1*10

] *000

73*83

1*500

C

1*56

1*001

73*86

2*501

D

2*43

1*002

73-90

3*503

E

3*30

1*003

73-95

4*506

F

416

1*005

74-02

5-510

G

5*3

1*007

74-10

6-517

H

5-49

1 *009

74-20

7-526

I

6*36

1*012

74*31

8-538

K

7*22

1*015

74 *43

9*553

L

8*9

1-019

74*57

10*57

M

8*56

1*023

74*72

11*59

N

9*42

1 027

74-89

12*62

O

10-29

1*032

75-07

13-65

P

11-15

1*037

75-26

14-69

Q

12*2

1*043

75-47

15-73

II

12-48

1 *049

75-70

16*78

s

13-35

1-055

75-94

17-84

T

14*22

1*062

76*20

18*90

U

15*8

1*069

76-47

19-97

V

15*55

1*077

76*76

21*04

W

16-41

1*086 *

77-06

22*13

X

17*28

1*094

77-38

23*22

Y

18*14

1*104

77*72

24*33

Z

19*1

1*114

78-08

25*44

A

19*48

1*124

78*45

26*57

B

20*34

1*135

78-84

27*70

C

21*21

1-147

79*25

28-85

D

22*7

1*159

79*68

30*01

E

22-54

1*172

80*13

31-18

F

23*40

1-185

80*60

32-36

G

24*29

1*199

81-09

33-56