C 112. )
Uncircumcision mentioned Ver. 25* which wasimputative or superinduced through the Transgres-sion of the Law, by such as had been actuallycircumcised. But the new Version, instead ofthe Uncircumcision , which is by Nature , says,a Gentile not aUually circumcised. But he fuaeweand (pauzi, in the New Testament , do not barelydescribe what a Thing is atlually , but also whatit is originally.
XVI. Rom. iii. 20. Ry the Law is the Know -
Gr. ’Erniywais dya-pricei. So Grotius explainsthe Words. But the Translator renders thus.It is the Law that takes Cognizance of Sin .Not that indyvoxns ever signifies Cognizance: Buthe was not willing that the Knowledge and Ob-ligation of moral Duties should arise from the,Will of God .
XVII. 1 Cor. vi. 14. As God hath raised up
Chris , so will he raise up you , <h<*Sbvdyacos durS by his own Rower .
The new Version, utterly against both Truthand Grammar, fays, to partake of his own Rower .Christ’s own or Essential Power in raising thedead, is a Notion too high for the Arian Scheme,and therefore kept out of View", at any Rate.
XVIII. 1 Cor. xi. 9. St. Paul fays, that the Manwas not made <h« t ti> ywa. 7 ^ forthe Woman.
But the new Interpreter makes him fay, _ inSpite of Syntax , that the Man was not copiedfrom the Woman * XIX.