( Ir 3 )

XIX. I Cor. xii. 28. YLcliU per «$**» ° Stls orth ’ExjtA/jOTa, 7rgslov dizrozo Aas.

God hath'[ot some in the Churchy jirjlJpojiles.

' But the Translator mistaking «« for a Relative*renders thus: Which God hath placed in theChurch, (fe. He was ignorant that neither theGenius of the Greek Language at large, nor ofHellenism in particular, ever allows pXv immedi-ately to follow the Relative os- or cVts. SeeMat. xiii. 32. xxiii. 27. j 0 s iii. 21. ‘Phil. i. 28.Col. ii. 23. * In all which Places those Relativesare still separated from the Particle fj.h. Besides,the parallel Place, Epb. iv. 11. makes it plain,that «s is no Relative. So also does A whichprecedes it, and of which our Man takes noNotice in the Version.

XX. I Cor. xvi. 2. KaTO ]JJ.xv Oil

the firft Z )ay of the Week.

So Mat. xxv iii. 1. The new Interpreter, judg-ing, as his Manner is, by Sounds, translates itevery Sabbath Hay. But then the Greekwould have been' n&m to v X*/ 3 / 2z.mv\ . As at

Æts XV. 20.

* Mr. Fierce of Exeter, for want of knowing this, is muchperplexed in his Notes on Col. ii. 15 . The Remoteness of(aI; from the Beginning of the Sentence, seemed so strange tohim, that he judges it necessary to look out for a new Con-struction of the Original Words different from that which ourTranslators followed. But he might have spared his Labour.For uiv certainly belongs to ehi though the Idiom of theGreek Tongue, will not suffer them to stand closer together.

Q.

xxi.