2y6 Demi Berkeley 1 sscheme exdmidsds

the states we are in, and only finds 6°^with Cartes for publishing, as a new met h°of doubting, that which Plato and other* hsbroached long before him (y): which, ^the way, is a strange fort of an object* 011 'The inconsistency of this doubt, or thisstion, is plain, I think, in that no mana right to make it, but he who hath expe-rience of both the different states. If he ^only been in one of them, he can kn o# r! °.difference , and therefore be in no doubt:if he has been in both, and remembers a de-ference, he must know it ; and therefo^ ,Sobliged to answer himself, as having a c ° n 'scions experience of the thing he desires to*finformed in. Since sleep is a state in wh^the faculties of the foul are obstructed, ° simpeded, by the indisposition of the a& ite ?of the body, especially memory; since tb isl |so, I say, for a waking man to desire a ^or sign , whereby to know if he beis as if he should desire another man to t e ‘

(y) Satis conjlat ex Us ques dicta funt in bactione [prmasdl.] nullumesse quosomnia 0 si

avigilia , id senfione verd dignoscantur ; -— ~~veP ta sitem hujus meditationis agnoscimus. Sed queniam &dew incertitudine fenfibilium difputavit Plato, bo

hrM,