and Jhewn inconclusive. 297

J st], Whether he hath the powers of his foulbberty or not ? which he himself can know

> The soul hath not some powers to be|^Peded } and other powers of the same kind

re Kiain still free; it should then have two^scioufnef'es ; therefore it is improper to ask,a keeping man can have a mark to know^ e ther he steeps ? nor is it less improper for? taking man to ask a mark to know if hej; a Wake. In the first cafe , there is a want

> c °nscioufness of the state we are in; and^ the second, a consciousness that we are not^ *he first state: what doubt can there thenterrain here ? If the powers of the foul werejj°t impeded in steep, that state would notQl ffer from being awake, except in the indif-^ O htion of the body: but since it differs sot^dely otherwise, who can be excusable inpending not to know the difference ? At^ lS rate, men might ask a sign to know,Whether they are blind, or not, or how they^ be certain that they are in their sober

etl fes rather than mad (st)-, and whether,

when

,, (*0 Pyrrho indeed, and the Sceptics, seem to deny a

^ er ence between these tivo - dS\ yds o! iMuvounvoi

cpuViv ’iyytsi. Ts yd? pdAhov ir.wn i, ;

<hff<