INDEX.
then there must be as many different activities and percep-tivities, as parts in the foul, ibid. & seqq. The absurditiesof such a supposition, ibid. both defined, ibid. 248, band what is meant by being active and perceptive, ibid.
ASivity, Perceptivity, properties of the foul in a state of se-paration from the body, ibid. 250, 2, & seqq. and thatnot only sometimes, but always, i. 261, 7. proved, in amore mechanical way of reasoning, that these powers can-not be separated from acts, or that they subsist in barepotentiality, i, k, ibid.
— 1 ■ ■ the ideas, by which we know a Spirit to be a sub-
stance. Seeii. 257, 8. and i. 322, 22. The difference be-twixt the activity and perceptivity of human fouls, an»that of brutes, i, 347, 27. And whether these propertiesare not as inseparable to them, as to human fouls, if theysurvive the dissolution of their bodies, ibid. b. ibid. whythese powers are qualified, and kept under in steep, ’*
40-- 13-
Aether. See Neavton.
Air , its wonderful elasticity; necessarily infers an immaterialmover, i. 89, 4. See e, f g, ibid. Its compression and ex-pansion, ibid. promotes fermentations, i, 223, e.
Alexander the Great, a dream of his, when his friend fe-lonry was wounded with a poisoned dart, mentionedthis place to shew that the foul would not impose uponself as a reality then, what must appear an impossibility t0it, at all other times, ii. 63, 18.
Animalcula, that there are such pre-existing, in the fern- 0 ''not to be more doubted of, than the circulation of £ h S
blood, i, 198, 32. See ibid. 214, 38, s.
Animals, could not have a progressive motion, if matter W enot resisting, i, 66, 23, 24. How wisely tied to earththe constant impulse of gravitation, i. 71, 25. What f“ a ^they have in producing motions, i. 175, 24. See >*bid. , n( j
■ the specisick difference betwixt animals rational a
irrational, i. 177, n. 3 ]
< the origin and rudiments of every animal one coe
system, i, 198, 32, v. ibid.
■ how different in their first stamina and various stag eS ’
from what they are in their last perfection, i,g. ibid.
irrational. See Brutes.
Anirt^