A Treatise of Cap. r.

meetsandbounbaries, slthobsh ldme men hade takenrhete differences aforesaid.

And whereas it is beko?essid» eitherlcnown by mas-ter of Record, or else, by prescription, therein is iheWed,dp whatmeanL the marks, meers and boundaries okforests are to be Known, which is bx one ok these twomeans, o:else vx both ok them ; to?, ail Mch w?ests

were neMx enlarged bx the afforestation ok Lingttenry the second, Ring Richard the first, o? Ling John*thote Khests babe their marks, meers and bounds-ries, Knowlt W> matter of Mco?d, id? there were peram-bulations of them Mode in the time ok Edward the first,because of the disaffo?estativn of those- new affo?estati-otrs r And so sll those fo?ests hade their marks, meers-and boundaries known st this dsx dp matter ok Re-cord r Mit sll wch forests as were sntient Forests be-fore the time ok Mng Eenry the second,, whereof therewere no such peranibulstions made lime his time, be-cause § Zknhsbitgnts neer shout kuch kvMs hsd no causeto coplsin ofanxtuch new Lffo?ettstlk:nL,sLthe othershsd,Thereko?e sll those fo?errs hade their marks, meers-snd boundaries,known bp prescription onlx, so? there isno matter of I5ero?d to be found to know tbe marks*Meers and boundaries of those wMs vx. And' there-fore it is said, either Known by matter cf Record, orelse, by prescription, so?, there is no other wap to Knowthem dp: Wnto this it max be objected and said, thatthe Ling cannot mskes fc:eft hnt bp matter of iffero?o:which I conkesse to be true, but per rbe DE max hadeSfo?et,' bx Matter of RE?d, mm ^er the marks, meersrind boundaries kbereo', are not now to be Known b?matter of Keco?d,bm onlx bx P?eKrlptton;fo? althougb,when lfith snfient fo?estes were first made , themarkes? Meers and bnmdsries thereof were thenknown bx matter of Neco?d r Pet It is now tslong ago

iince