Cap. 3. the Foreii Laws.

which hade lain open so? fo?t? xesr 0? MVZ, max Nowenclose them, and keep them encloKd as Darks.Fourthly, whether Dwr coming out of the Forest intosuch enclosed grounds max be killed b? the owners oflstch grounds r and upon these WuekionS, the Counselofhoth parties being there. First, thex all held, thata forest max well be in the hands of a Dubject, and shallbe used as s wrest, if the Ling gibes Zluthorilx bx es-p?esse words lo? the Administration ok I.Kice there,and fo? his Justices, to come there r and that if Kich agrantee might hade Commission in stich Cases, to useand hade Dsticers ol a forest; then it lhal! continue aforest in the hands ok a Aubjea, otherwise without suchliberties it is but a Chase being in the hands ok acommon person. 2 nd Popham said, that he had kLnsuch liberties ok forest granted in that manner. De-condlx, thex all held, that in lbch forests e? chskes (be-ing in the hands ok a common perkon) those who areowners ok woods max cut them down st their pleskure,Withcut license o?diew ok the Foresters. Mit xet ininch manner as thex ought slwaxs to leads tussicientdert ko? the DLr there. Lhirdlx, thex all held, thatthex max p?ekcribe to hade warrens,o? to Keep Aheep inforests, alrhough they were in the Lings hands. Mitwithcut a special prescription it cannot be -> and in stick-cake ok prescription ko? warren, alrhough it had not beenused so? bikers pears, if he had it bx grant, o? canp?odr it bx prescription a non user is no cause of forfei-ture thereof. Mit Air Edw. Coke taid, it vsd been ad-Nidged, that the Non user of a Fair o? syarket, o?Courts, 0? such like iibertieswherein the subjects hadeinterest ft>? their common P?v6t 0 ? common Justice, iscauk olAeistire of them: but the no - user of Marks e?Mlarrene, 0? lUch tike, which are to the p?M only, o?pleasure ok the owner, is not anx cauls ok their lots o?

F so?-