Cap. 3. the Forest Laws.

appear bx matter ofNeco?d, as bx Gx?es of Justices offo?ests,Dwanimstes,Dfficets of fo?ens,as Keguarbo?s,Agisters, Merdero?s, ac. but the Appellation of it hxthe name of a fo?est in Grants, Offices, attb (lfondex-attcee, is not an? proofthat this is a finest in slate.

2 . At was refolded bx all the Justices, that if theseare not other then free Chafes, and no ft>?ests in Hats,then he who hath an? freehold within them, max cut hisLimber and Wlood growing upon it, without an? biefco0 ? license of anx : but if he cut fa much that there isnot sufficient so? Cobert, and to maintain the Game ofthe Ring, he shall be puniihed at the suit of the Ling.And so if a comon person hath a Chafe in another foil,the owner of the foil cannot destrox al! the Levert, butought to leave sufficient Cobert, and sufficient Wroufe-wood, as hath been accustomed.

Z. It was refolbed, that within such a Chafe theowner of the foil bx prescription max habe common forhis Dheep, and warren kd? Gomes bx grant o? pre-scription : but he cannot surcharge with mo?e thenhath been used, then from which, yc. no? make Nur-rows in other places then hath been used front the timeof which, se. unlesse he hath warren bx grant, and thenhe max use it according to his Grant, but he cannoterect a new warren without Charter.

4 . At was refolded, that he who hath such a warrenmax lawfullx build upon his inheritance, within hisWarren, a conbenient Lodge so? preservation of hisGame.

5. At was said bx Popham chief Justice, that it wasadjudged in the time of the chief Baron Beer, in theGfchequer, that a man max p?eftribe to cut Ins woodupon his own Inheritance, within a forest, klt'vughit Was against the Act in the 4Z.P6.l.whi h is in the A-dnc!Zinsoc,Iitle,5orsli.ri.And this WastheCafeol^l-

F 2 lenZer,