cia d&t Treatise of Cap. ^

mcn fiftK -lMchis M [no? .Embers so? the killing ofour denifon.r Were note, that that 8o?d.prv.vena-* none, must. be understood so? snx beast of Forest o?Chafe: so? defyre tu making of the (peat Charter c-fthe forest, the killing oftm? to«o bestt within the so?sftwas punilhable the King st hfs will and plealure,and not bv aux Law certain.: And therefore the Lingmight hade puniihed a,man the killing of s Ware, o?

a Fox,o? a pattern, >o? aux other dealt of fc?rfr, beforethe granting of the great Charter of the Fo?ett, edenwith the lolfe of Use, o? the wife ofsnArm r And there-fore ts the end to take the bett addantage of the wordsof the Charter, Nullusde œte to amittat vitam vel mem-bra pro venationc nostra, must be understood, that thetrtantne of the Charter must be that from henceforth-no man wall lose life c? member pro venatione noftra,so? the killing vfhenifon: thst is Lo? the killing of snxbeast of Fo?est o? Chafe, andlb that wo?d Veoatio,Menison, is understood anx beast of Forest o? Chafe;and so likewisefn the,fame Charter, where iris ap-pointed,who onlx (ball hold-Pleas of the Forest,in thestka- words, l^ullor eonkabularill-, Csilell-nu,, vel Ballivm,jcst»,*rvic. is. teneat placUa de Boresta, five de Viiidi, five de Venati-ons, So Constable, Csstellsin, o? Wailist, lhsll hold anxP'ea of anx matters rf the Fo?est,either of dert o? of be>* nifsn.'Mhere Sote,that there that wo?d pro v^natione,

? .. i .^ must'beunderstoodofthekilling,hunting,o?chafingof

^ : f. . « anx beast that is within the Fo?est., be it beast of forest,or beast of chafe: fothstsll the pleas of the lo?est areour de viridi, autde venadone, either of dert,c?of dent'stm r And again in the new Ordinances that weremade bx Ling -Edw. the first, in 34. xeer of his Neign,called, ordinario koreks (but in the Uegister ot write,O.dinstio and also of some others, it is called ad ditto Forcstae) the

Forest*. Ling doth make a special prodilono? jaw, that eberx

Fo?e-