rZ6 \ A.Treatise of Cap'. 3.

2: This the Laws of the Forest do restrain everyman from catting down of his woods withinhis own freehold in the Forest.

A M that a msn map not fell; no? cut down hisown woods being within the Fo?est, it doth ax.pi thetberts pearbx st Cafe adjudged in the time of Ling E; I. thatabridgment in bx the Laws of the fo?est no man max cut down his«etz,s.»z§.. Woods no? destrox snx roderts within the forest;

Without the biew of the Fo?ester, and license of theLv?d chief Justice in Gx?e of the fo?est; although thatthe. soit wherein those woods do grow be a mans-awnfreehold.

And also, in An. 9. ic 10. Eliz. J dostnd one specialEase concerning the felling of woods within the so*

’ restofWaltham ; which Caseic as follower!) V VVr»yfaith, that if a Syano? which is within a fo?est of theLings,as ok WaKham,do escheat tmto the Ling,and af-terwards the Ling do gibe that Spans? unto another infee, he hath not in the gift of the spano? gidenunto himthe lidertx that he himself had in tde Gano? touchingthe fo?estzfo? nederthelew the lbme is within the ko?est,stnd lUbieet to the feed of the Deer, and wild dessts okthe fo?est, and hecannot cut down his woods that strethere within the fo?est, without license os the Justiceof the fo?est, so? that is st thing collateral to the soil,and so, in the gist os the soil; a thing collateral to thesoil, as things os p?erogatibe, 0? a lidertx, cannotpasse:Mx which case xou msxnote, that no man canhade anx Gano?s 0? Lauds within the wsest, but thaethe? must be subject to the Laws and bondage of rdefo?elk, unlesse that dx some good title thex be special!?erempted out of the fame; so? the Ling must babe hiswild beasts maintained^)? his delight, which cannc t be