. i%6 A Treatise of, Cap. i s.

pawnage, there bx that wo?d ^atmaage is understoodthe Monex ko? the Agisting ot the woodsrand to likewise,charS de so- whereas the wv?dL os Lksrt, de korefto ore, LkhabcsexcL», rruc.I. p-nnsgium sullw.SNd he lhsU hade the pswnsge ok hisown woods, there, hx that wo?d kLvnsgc, is understoodthe.p?o 6 t ok the Gast, o? the monex that is receided ko?the some; and likewise, where the wo?ds ok ^Kk» ko-ALla L con- reklL are, Quod deinceps capiatur pro quolibet porcoswudines F®- quantum potcst,ad opus d*mini Regis, pro pannagio : th Streft*, aruc. 14* hereakter there lhall be taken ko? ederx hog,as much asmsx be, to the uke ok the Ving-, so? pawnage, that is tokax, apenx, o? twopence so? ederx hog, there, that wo?d?a«nage ^iLMderNvod id? themmnex thar w dueko? theSyatt. G.ttesKst in hlL Nestding ok.the Charter ok theFo?est kaith, that kr«sosge is not proverlx the Aglst.ment, 0? mast ok the woods ftz? hogs, but the. monex o?p?ostt list is due to be paid to the Ring,o? to the ownerok the? woods, ko? the tamerand he kaith,that it hath been^ ne^r.s.48 adjudged,in the time okLd-r- where one sought an acti-on ok trekpasse. against John at StiU, ko? entring into hisKark, and with his cattel there eating up ok his psw-nage-, and there, kaith he, the w?it wasMtedbx theaward ok the Court V so? the w?tt ought to hade been,Qgeil ove ses avers peflbnem fuam la depaft, and not qua>1 ove ses avers pannagiura strom la depaft, iwhich is, thathe With' his cattel did eat up his mast there, and not,that he With his cattel did eat.up his pawnage there:ko?, the pawnage is or-ilx the,monex that is psid ko? them.ast,andnottheGatt,ashe rattd: crvLreokthis cake,ko? % can stnde no kuch cakerepo?ted.

Vide lidrum doth appear in the WovK ok Entries, in an asi-inrrskion,!, f°i. on ok Trelpaste d?ought against the Wilhop ok Lovenkrx5§;.'iresx»srln ynd Lichfield,, ko? the taking and d?iding awax ok cer-tamhogs. Where the Mchop doth justiste the rrekpaffe,dr reason that he was teiked ot a great chake-as in rights

ok