Cap. 14. the Forest Laws.'

place kith his beaks t-nr number, without number begrsll not be sccomptev a furcharger, no? in a w?ir ofatl-meaforemenr he Kali not be admeskired: but it lvemetbvx the Fo?ek Law,that if be that hath common withins Ko?eK to common there fans number, dy surcharge the M.Heskocj'.common kith to many beaks, that the wtld beaks ofthe Lings k?ett cannot hade sufficient feed there, thensuch a Commoner in a fo?ek lhall be sccompted a fur»charger, and mall be punilhed as a furchsrger ofcheLings w?ek: so tfjat he that baths specialtxto com-mon krthm the Wings lo?ek kith bis beaks fan, num-ber, yet it is to be understood by that ko?d sans num-brr,that he must common with such a number of beaksthere, that the kilo beaks of the Wings fo?ek max hsdealso sufficient feed so? them left there besides.

And this max 5eem to be lak,bx the tame reason that I'"'"- i* h.siBrooke Justice ok the Common Mess did alledge in 12. h«rzof H.a.totere he ksith, Thar if a man do grant common M *without number, yet the grantee max not put in to ma-ny cattel 10 common there, but that the grantor mawstill have sufficient common lo? himself in the fame landto common with the beasts ;fo? otherwise the grantee isa mrchsrger: Eadem ration, he that hgth common ingroffe Krthm a K?est, fans number, yet he must not com-mon there with so many beasts, but that the wild beasts vl«/c>!.8°.y:ofthe Fu?est max KM hghe sufficient herbage left re- 0 ?s™ rL? s<?matmns so? then foot.; so? isanp man do otherwise, he " ^'

fhal! be accompked a furchsrger of the Fo?est.A„d in kikemanner it is olbim, that KM claim Gommon sppur-tensnr within a Fo?est, fo? beasts without number; yetas I think, in mine own opinion, by the same reason,he is to use his Common kith Mch number of beasts,that the wild beasts of the Fo?ek max hade suffictentso? tbeir seed lest remaining, so? otherwise he is to besccompted a Dmchsrger of the Fo?est^ and lo he char

^ 3 hgch