Cap. 16. the Forest LaWs. 247

the? are not to be kept in a Forest, but snip bx g grantfrom the Ling. ^ . .

3 tn the Miles and Lukoms ok the Fo?elr,lt is o?dai- Xmsg & cm-nea that those that do claim anx liberties or Vridj- lu-ru<im« so-leagoB, as to kKp A>ogs unexpeditated, and to kwp rea^»rr.i7.Greyhounds within the bounds of the iFo^ft, that no-thing lhaN be done unto them that hade krch claims,without the Lings warrant, or the warrant ok the Ju-stices vk the Forest. Wx this it sppesreth, that Grex-hounds max not be Kept within a Fo?est without a goodclaim 0? warrant, no more then Spastides max unerpe-ditated: for ik it were lswkul w? men to Keep Grey-hounds in the Forest without a good claim for thekame, it were needless to make's claim for it ; and winlike w?t ok other things.

Ant it doth appear b? sundrp claims, in t^e Mikes Picking/.anO Jeers cf Pickring, that men hade clsimed there, totzawk,and Wunt the Ware, within certain liberties,andalso to Keep spaniels. Wy this it is to be gathered,that therefore Spaniels are not lawful to be Kept with-in a Forest without a claim ft? the kame: so? if the?were, then it were in batti to make a claim so? thatthing which were lawful otherwise. It doth appearh? the Laws Of CanutUJ, inhiL Zl. Canon, Quod ruI- CanutufjCfr?Ids rnediocris havebic, nee uiftodiet Canes quos Angli ,w “ 1 1 ‘Greyhounds appellant ike. that no mean man shallhade no? Kwp those B>ogs which GngliH men do callGreyhounds, within the Forest; w that ir lkmeeb,that even from the first beginning of Fo?ek Laws,Greyhounds hade always been forbidden to be keptin Forests.