Gap. 20. the Forest Laws.

kith Cop?, doth choke those wild beasts with h^ w*and before t!?at those dogs do emer into the JFoteif ozsr se Chose, he doth repel! and call them bock againthen although that the same dogs do enter in tl e Cfeafev?Fo?est, ar d do there kill the wild beaks, xet he isnot to be charged aaa trespasser so? that kissing inthe Forest o? Chase; Ergo, ff inch g Punter do notcall back bis dogs, before that thex do enter into an?

Ko?est o? Chare, if thex do chase o? kill anx wild beakttzere,he ib a Trespasser, and lhass be charged as a tres-passer ko? the Punting and Chasing ot his dogs there-in. 3nd therefore, b? the same reason, much mo?e lhallthex be accounted rretpassers that do Punt in the pou-rallees, and do not repess no? call back their dogs atass, but do follow them into the Forest, and there ani-mate and incourage their dogs to Wunt and llax thewild beasts; xea, and do also carrx the deer awax withth- m, most kooliihlx affirming that thex max lawfullxdo the same. 2nd to p?ode the authoritx of this casevs the Carl os ^runnel?, the mo?e stronger, to be Law,

Ft is holden in ?8. E. z. that it a man do knd a Feikrit i-in his own ground, and do there let his Faulcon Sie at E.,.r 0 “oithe same , and he stieth with the Fesant into a Mar- <h< ft* c»fcren, which is a p?ibiledged place so? birds of Marten,anO there doth kill the same, xet the owner os theFLulcov, in this case, lhall not hade the Fetant, al-though that his Gawk did kill the same; but the ownerof the Warren is to hade it; but tk luch killing of thesame fetant were not in a Warren or other especialVridiiedged place, then the Law were otherwise, SL itis holden bx SY.Lrook,in l 2 . Elenry 8.5. io. so? then the vide Mi,nowner of the faulcon were ro hade the fesant, note the L.s.ir.,. i,n ’difference: but xet this cake doth also p?ode, that sowon as the fesant, w'ich is wild os nature, was with.in the bounds ok the Marren, the fame was the owners

Wd z os