Cap. 2 I. tire Forest Laws.

keep to his oton use, tvherebx the Granger to to^omthex were delidered so to keep, doth d?idethemto hisown land being within theFo?est, and alterwsrds theowner osthose beasts doth take them out ok his lartd thathath the keeping os them, and d?ide them out os theFo?est: in thro ease the J&esie no? other sBfficer cannottake them again now being out m the SFojest. Wut o-therwise it i$, if tijat the Vedle o? other Dfficer had ta-ken the drstreste and delidered the beak unto a strangerto keep as a bistrefle: in this case,tftbe owner take them,and do d?ide them out of the Forest, xet the Wedke o?other Dfficer max frelhlx pursue them-, and take themagain from him, although that thex^be without the Fo-rest, in a so?rein Lountx. Oote the difference wheresuch beasts were delibered to be Kept ss s dittreffe, andwhere tobe kept to his own use.

Ifan Mfficer osthe Fo?est, o? other person that oughtto appear at the Awanimote Gourt, hade land withinthe Fo?ek, and the beaks of a.stranger do escape in-to vis land, bx reason whereof tbelaE-tenant doth di-strain them and put them in the Wound in the sameland,as in a Roundrand then afterwards isthe Wedle ofthe FoM doth knd them there so ledant and couchant,he max distrain them so? that amercement: but other-wise it is, ik those beaks were neder ledant and cou-chant there.

If the Wedle of the Forest, o? other Mstrcer, do breakthe close O? the land that is inclosed with a ditch, anda hedge, and a gate with a lock to it, and doth there di-strain so? such amercement osthe same man to whom theland doth belong r that distreffe is not lawfull? takenthere. And otherwise it is, if such Officers do distraintncb beasts in the highwa? within the Fo?ek,vut os anxclose o? incloldre.

And is one be amerced, ut supra, and after that he

is