Cap. 2Z. the Forest Laws. ^

Brant made b? the Lo?d of the Forest unto one ok bis r.»>»c.tol.;.p?edeceMurs, and his claim was allowed so? good.

An cslvone do claim d? prescription, bx tenure, o? bxgtsnt,ro be Foster ot fec,and praxeth that it max he en - Trial,quired of bp the ministers of the Fo?est; An this cake b ?m Werderors, Negardo?s, and Agisto?s stall trio ^ e ?* rdo «» &the Citie. JKiit if a man do claim bx inheritance o? <stherwikdanx p?o«t appendre within the Fo?est, as s 0 * ,y ’common of «stoderr,or a pasture, o? wch like; An thiscase the trial lhall be bx the Foresters, Werdero?s, andNegardors, but not bx the Asisto?s,proui: patet,8cc. Anease the matter os the claim do require a Trial bp theLountrx, there the concluston os the pleader than deEt hoc paratus est verificare prout Cur’ &c.Ideo inquiratur n .indc veritas per ministros ejusdem Forests. And in this .

cafe the Werderors, «egardo?s,and Sgistors lhall vnelxtrie the Title. Mftit pet notwithstanding, xou Wall sfederx man? Krestdents, that when che entrie hath bfen& hoc petit qd’inquiratur per ministros ejusdem Forestæ,

8cc.that this hath immediatlx enk,ed,vir. 8r quiavidetur i.,n««er>socur hic qd' expedite necesse est ad inquire nd um tarn per Lincaster, f 0 .».ministros forestæ praedictæ quam per alios probos & Iegales ^neater, s 0 ; 4 .*homines, &c. Lndthtts xou max (fe it is in the election ^ t3tmo J°-os the Justices, whether the ministers with others max Acrei 'be impanelled, quod nota, to inquire is there be an? pre-

stdent that the Countriebath tried an? Title os claimWithout the ministers or the Fo?elr,oc. v. supra,99.

Woodwards map not walk with bow and lhafts, but tfr ° odwar ^with Forest dills, quod nota. Pickering,

R Ogerus Coventr.St Litchfield Episcopus queritur Domi-no Regi de hoc,quod in ultimo itinere Rogeri extra "n', & fociorum suorum Justic. domini Regis de Foresta"in Com.Srafordfiidem Justic.boscos ipsius Epifc.de maneiriis tuis de Cantioclfe Tbtggelegb,m manum Donlini

Mm 2 siiii,..