Buch 
3 (1852) The principles and practice and explanation of the construction of the steam engine, including pumping, stationary, and marine engines : examples of boilers used for steam navigation, and of those employed in her Majesty's service; together with an example of the turbine wheel : including also the new subjects contained in the present amended edition of the late Mr. Tredgold's work, a glossary of terms applicable to marine engines and boilers, with French and Spanish translations, and a general index / [Thomas Tredgold]
Seite
8
JPEG-Download
 

8

ON PADDLE-WHEELS.

TABLE I.

Name ofthe vessel.

Tonnage.

Horse

power.

Effectivepressureexertedby theengine.

Velocity ofthe vessel,that of thewheelbeing 1.

Velocity ofthe verticalpaddlesthrough thewater, that ofthe wheelbeing 1.

Area ofthe paddleboard.

Area ofa verticalpaddleequal ineffect to allthe paddles.

Immersedsectionalarea ofthe vessel.

Ratio of theresistance ofthe vesselto that of aplane surfaceof the samesection.

lbs.

feet.

in.

Medea

835

220

4536

627

373

19

0

54-00

263

TnP

Flamer

494

120

2814

683

317

16

0

52-44

174

1

Flamer

494

120

2593

674

326

16

0

57-60

218

tV

Firebrand

494

120

2472

667

333

12

9

38-56

200

tV

Firebrand

494

120

2527

666

334

12

9

42-00

214

i

Ta

Columbia

300

100

1807

654

346

12

0

43-10

202

i

i-A

Salamander

820

220

2150

833

167

22

6

398-70

359

i

ITT

Dee

710

200

2531

732

268

20

0

69-00

209

i

TIT

Firefly

550

140

3808

733

267

18

0

201-00

275

i '

Firebrand

494

140

2474

772

228

18

0

128-61

200

i

TT

Pluto

365

100

985

823

117

16

6

105-23

116

i

Monarch

872

200

7167

748

252

20

0

Monarch

872

200

6976

746

254

20

0

Monarch

872

200

7002

756

244

20

0

Magnet

360

140

3672

763

237

15

0

Meteor

296

100

4320

671

229

13

6

Carron

294

100

1731

777

323

13

6

i.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

It thus appears, contrary to the results of all experiments hitherto made on the small scale,that the resistance of a well-shaped vessel does not exceed -j^th part that of a plane of the samesectional area.

The above mean, being founded on several experiments, must be very near the truth; althoughin each so much error may exist, from the want of minute attention to the number of strokes ofthe engine, as to afford no test of the best shaped vessel.

As, however, the results are very extraordinary, it may be well to submit them to a totallyindependent mode of estimation. In the above investigation, the mean number of acting paddles,with their corresponding velocities and areas, are compared with the sectional area of the vessel andits velocity; but we might have made the calculation in another way,that is, by comparing theforce necessary to urge a plane section equal to that of the vessel with the velocity at which it passesthrough the water, with the actual power of the engine employed to propel the vessel,which oughtto give nearly the same fraction as the other method.

Of the whole power of the engine, we have seen that with the vertically-acting paddle one-thirdis lost by the retrograding of the wheel: in the Medea, therefore, the power employed in propellingthe vessel is two-thirds of 220 = 146 horse-power: now the velocity of the vessel having been

11-33 English miles per hour, or 16 - 62 feet per second, the resistance in feet of water is ^ and

64-g-

(16 62) x 621 -, on each square foot. The number of feet in the section is 263, and the velocity

in fts.

641

in feet per minute is 997; the whole force, therefore, expended in a minute, is 70,796,970, which,divided by 33,000, gives 2150 horse-power for the force necessary to urge a plane section of 263 feetthrough the water at the rate of 11*33 miles per hour: but the vessel itself is urged with that velocityby the power of 146 horses ; the resistance to a vessel is therefore to that of a plane section of thesame area as 146 to 2150, or as 1 to 15 very nearly, which exactly agrees with the number givenin the Table. The agreement is equally close in the Flamer; and the mean obtained this wayfrom the whole set of experiments is very nearly the same as that given in the above Table.