Z4 EbwJTI, Naval Expeditions] &c of the English^

Book l

Brady.

Cotton Libr.

Uackluyf.

, The North Fleet.

Furnijhed by

Ships.

Mariners.

Ships.

Mariners.

Bamburg

1

9

X

9

Newcastle

37

414

i7

3*4

W alwich ( Walkrich)

X

12

1

12

Hartlepool

S

145

5

*45

Hull

16

466

16

466

York I

1

9

X

9

Ravenspurg (Ravenser)

X

28

X

27

W oodhoule

1

12

X

22

JStolkhithe ( Stroke-hith )

X

10

X

10

Barton

3

3°

3

30

Sun-fleet (' Snvyne-fleet )

1

XX

1

11

Salt-fleet

2

49

2

49

Grimsby ( Gryn-jleet

11

71

11

171

Wain-fleet

2

44

2

49

Wrangle

X

8

1

8

Lynn

19

482

16

382

Blackney

2

38

2

38

Scarborough

X

19

1

19

Yarmouth

43

1905

43

1075 0)

Dunwich

6

102

6

102

Orford

3

62

3

62

Goford {Gofforord')

-3

404

*3

3°3

Harwich

14

283

14

283

Ipswich

12

239

12

239

Mersey ( Morten )

1

6

I

6

Brickelsea ( ' Brought lynfea )

5

61

5

61

Colchester

5

170

5

90

Whitbanas

X

*7

1

*7

Derwen

X

15

1

*5

Boston

*7

3 6e

17

Z 6 r

Suinhumber

X

32

1

32

Maiden

2

32

2

32

Barton

5

61

5

9 i

Total of the North Fleet

217

452*

217

4521

Total ot the whole Englijh Fleet 700

14x51

700

14151

Foreigners.

Bayon

15

439

-5

439

Spain

7

x 84

7

184

Ireland

X

25

X

35

Flanders

14

*34

14

133

Guelderland

1

24

1

24

Total of the whole Fleet 738 14956 738 14956 (0)

To this List of Ships, I {hall add a short Account of the whole Charge ofthis King’s Fleet and Army, as we find it in Brady .

The

I

(») This List in ffackluyt fays 1950, or1075.

(0) The Sum Total of the Ships and Menof the whole Fleet, as well ai of the particular

Fleets, agree, m both Lists, tho’ they disagreein several Articles: But they are both wrong castup. However, as the Difference is not great, Ihave chosen to give them as I found them.