PROLEGOMENA. Cap.II.

«v^foV. v. 3Z. vel potius r*' (non ‘Egexvxlrw) & x*Ax,«a habet

fTi habet y^/ev. ibici. x^couxt.V. 42. habet Alex. Sc zQxyo-

f*tV‘ Gap. XX. V. 7. eljfaS-ev. V. ID.

yjjv habet v4/ex perinde ut Ro-mana Editio, v. 12.9 juxta He-braeum extat in MS. ibid. «Vesaevi*!»perperam .scriptum. Gap. XXI.

V. 2 .*V* T0f Cnon A/uäts?^ 'A^S ffoeiS.V. 14. T? yp. V. 18- ’A 8 r«s-ö) 9 -£i. Gap.XXII. v. 3- recte scriptum

fuit, licet postea <r fiiperscriptumsit, ut sieret. v. 27.

scriptum juxta Hebr. v. 33.Süv»jj.iv habet MS. v. 43. %vovv.v. 47- ° in Bibliis Pol. male ex-cluditur. Cap. XXIII. v. 9. xvißsn-

«■ev. v. 13. jrfl^m&tAoy. v. 16. eturov.v. 18. 2«^»'i«f (non nam /

quod priori <* subnexum videtur estlinea tranlparens ex adverse foliiparte, v. 24. y. Z8. ’a£« 5 ~ est

in Alex, quod propius ad veramlectionem accedit, quam 'A?««,v. 36. rxä&l. y. 37. SoAeyi legendumputo , ita ut ^ Hebraeo L respon-deat. Cap. XXIV. v. 23. voxpost B-ios deest in Alex. y. 24. tjj\*a&> habet MS.

LIB. III. REGUM.

Cap. II. V. 12. tS 3 -^dvsf. y. 13. ir%o<r.tKvvttav xv-njv litera y per virgulamexpressa, v. 22. W» ZxpxviTriv juxtaHebr. v. 30. i<.7rof>iv<rouxi. ibid. b«i/»’»

(non b*/kk) scriptum est. v. 32. ««rg-Postea in Interpolationeb*a*a<*9- legitur. Cap. III. v. 15.Eaiv-rd in fine. Cap. IV. v. IO. Ls^A-d.

V. II. irxirxv. V. 19. N«a-»cp (non ’Evx-‘ r <P) nam e linea transverse expun-ctum est V. 21. a-fo<reyyi£ovT£f rectescriptum in Alex. v. 33. 'E^«iA.'rq>'

MS. Cap. VI. v. 1. T2o-s£»*!cc^.Cap. VII. v. 45. * post ßxeiAia; nOllest in MS. Alex. Cap. VIII. v. 9.

x SuBvto, y. 7 3, xiavo; nOll xiavxc uti

B. P. habent. Duo Versus sc. 12.& 13- desunt in Cod. Rom. ubietiam ä Textu excluduntur in Bibi.Bof. V. 44. eis's. Cap. IX. V. I. oixt-$c t uuv. y. 16. «ffefoA«? recte scriptumin Alex. v. 24. non »j Bvyxrr^-,sed 5 ta»jV Bvydrr ^, absque articulo,plane scriptum est. Cap. X. v. 1.

deest in Alex. y. 4. t>iV ante <?>£«-v>i<r/v non habet MS. v. 15. wtf«.V.21. in sine B. Pol. Textum Alex-andrinum perperam exprefllruntatque distinxerunt hunc in modum1 .HAaiua)v tieoTiiv or 1 <Scc. CUni lcgCll-dlimsit: ^.xAuiuuv (i; 0, 71 oi/v ,' 071 &C.Cap.XI v.2.^«^i<*f«sTwy.y.xpro Aixqgrßü!. v. 33. 7 C~i "Z-xpus. Cap.XII. V. 8. Sc IO. »oris, non 7*.V. 28 . ixayS&xi. y. 53. kuw, £ super« scripto. Cap. XIII. V. 3. « ante7 i%xs omissum in MS. occasionepraecedentis ds-ro. y. 4. ixv7ov. y. 5.e deest in MS. y. 12. dwvAßiv. y. 18.tTrkffvsatv. ibid. omissae voculae f*VtoV. Cap. XIX. v. 15. ix.7eAir factumex tuTiAer Cap. XV. v. 3. Aaw!^ t«7rx7(>oc juxta Hebraicam, & ipsiusrei veritatem. Editiones Aid. ScCompl. conveniunt etiam cum Cod.Alex, contra Rom. Cap. XVIII.v. 28. <rti£upoi<;xK juxta Hebraeum.Cap. XIX. v. ult. rd*ietv recte habentMS. Cap. XXII. v. 12 ante AvßxmAkx non est in MS. v. 30. <^y-

xxA ytfov jus. y. 33. X 7 rt?^i^xv. y. 34.evi 7 uvtv. v. 42. ZuAxAoi. y. 45. ßxi n-

Atuiv. Vide etiam Prolegom.ad T. I.Cap.II. §. 2.

LIB. IV.