j,io HYPATIA Ltb. V< eap. 21,

versam latine Epistola k ) brevis ad CyrlUum Alex, pro fupposititia^.iiabetur non fine certissima ratione. Philosophiam docuit, &ma-themata, I) Ifidori Philosophi conjux , m) sed ita ut conjugiiusu abstineret. Insano plebis Alexandrinae tumultu, praefecti Ale-xandrini Orestis cum Cyrillo inimicitias n ) Hypatiae imputan-tis,

suis ad Hesychium illustrem pag, aoj. & stigidius Menagius in Historia mulierumrhilosopharum, qvi tamen fallitur cum pag.f 6. putat in Salmafii Epistola Obser-vationibus ad jus Atticum & Romanum errore typographico vel memoria: lapsuHippiam pro Hypatia appellari. Nam utiqve de Hippia Sophista non de Hypatiaibi Salmasiusloqvitur, respicitqve ad ea qva: de Hippia nullum genus artis velopificii inexpertum relinqvente narrat Apulejus in floridis. Prseterea Rev. D.Jo.AndreseSchinidiusuiatribamdeHipparcho , duobusTheonibus atqve Hypa-tia vulgavitJenx 1691. 4.

k) Epistola illa exstat in Synodico contra tragoediam Irenaoi, qvod post Christianum

Lupum edidit Stephaniis Baluzius in Tom. 1. Concilior, pag §r§ & Jo. Garne-rius in Auctario Theodoreti pag. 673. Epistolam integram etiam exhibet Mena-gius , qvi eam Hypatia: nomen mentiri non dubitat, qvemadmodum nec Tille-montius Tom, 14. Memor. Eccles. pag. öoö,

l) Socrates VII, j 5. de Hypatia ! 'Emi rofXTOv Trgxßn xx/Selxe , cJe v 7 reg’XZcvTt<s<xi

tsssxxt ceuTJjv CpiAoceCpMj'» r^vcii VlhXTwixnv xtto nxair/v« xxrxyofxtvnv hx'

Tfißfjv , J^Jtj 7 TXVTX TX QlkOtfOQX UX&q/XXTX TO~f ßxAO/XMOK iXTI-

B’ecS'Xf. A /0 Hßi Ql 7 TXVTX%l$liV <pO^CCi<ptHv'fixkc/uievot XXTtTgt% 0 V 7 TXQ XVTW

Sic. Eadem ex Socrate Hist. Tripartita XI. 11. & Nicephorus XIV. I< 7 . Philo-florgms VIII. 9. ■xxqx tx xxtoc; i^xcxneoii tx [xx&n/jixrx, 71oA.oi Js xqht t»ytvt&oq tx StSxnxxKx 5 //M poxAt^acyi ~tgi rjv xtgo&idfxovx te;/vsjv > ndi xx-S 'nynexi&xi St 1rofkoiv h roTs (/.x^nf^xm. Svidas : Ti! 'y <püeiv ywx\OTtgx tS

TTXTgO f XffX , XX xpxi&tl T0~( V7T0 T 6ÜV lAX&lj/JCXTUV nct^tUplt Xsr/V CiTOtS 7TXTgl,xTax (ptAotrctylx; tji\,XTQ xTAtjs xx xyswais- 7 st§ißx^ouivn yxg Tgtßwx*1 yw>i njfi Stx tAcx rS xst@- Trotn/x&n rxi XfooSxg , e|»?y «to Snjxoeix ro~t

uxgoxc&xi ßxKOjxtm? y, tov YlhXTcuvx , r- rov Agt'ortAnv > n xx «?Rk arx 5»}tA R discipulis Hypatia: fuit Syncfius, qvi eam magnis mactat lau-

dibus Episl.tfT. 135.153. Vide & Epistolam 1 s. ubi hydroscopium ab ea mittisibi petit, & 33, 80, ii4,& 10. ubi per eam condiscipulos qvondamsuos , rxVfjLXxx^imxxrxe trxifXi salutat ex qvibus Epist. iff. nominat Ihecttcnum & Atha.yiaßum , ipsam Hypatia m ^/JWj'xccAäv appcIlans.

m) Svidas i n 'Txxrtx ex vita Ifidori aDamascio scripta.

*») Vide Valesium ad Socratem pag.8<). Oothofrenum ad Philostorgium pag 339. Mi-mis est credibile qvod scribit Hesychius Illustris & exeo Svidas tam gravia illameste pastam Stx rijv v 7 rtgßxfites<TXv tfoQtxv , nui uxaizx «V tx xtgl x-pcvcu/xf.Vel qvod Philostorgius , Stx-nrxi&nvcn to yvvxtov vno txv to ofxoxeiov itpu-ßiuovTm- Veriora videntur qvse Socrates atqve eji Damascio idem Svidas re-tulit.