4-3 6 ObjeSlions , &c.

And yet there is no possibility of making thisconclusion, but by allowing the truth of allmanner of contradictions (N° 2, 3, and 15.)This brings the dispute to a short issue. Sothat in effect, our very eating , drinking,seeping-, our taking medicines, curing ourdiseases, our weakness as well as strength, oursickness and health; every circumstance andaccident of our bodies, ought easily and prac-tically to satisfy us at all times, of the imma-teriality of our fouls; if we accustom ourselvesto think with exactness and propriety on thissubject. Therefore, tho’it hath been here allalong allowed, and supposed, that these ef-fects are equivocal and fallacious appearan-ces ; yet we are now at last to correct that sup-position ; for in truth there appears no symp-tom, or defect, or accident in the body thatis equivocal, or could follow equally fromcither hypothesis: but those very appearanceshitherto called ambiguous, conclude againstthe materiality of the foul, which they werebrought to support.

disposition of matter, would be to make all matter ne-cessarily active and percipient. See also again the rea-soning at note ( b) N° 15. above. »

FINIS.

Printed by James Bettenham.