( 6o )

cum Ductu suo Salivali D, jam primum a nobis descripto, cujus variae Ra-mificationes per totam Glandulam dilpertae conspiciuntur.pi S- 7- Figura Altera , indicat duo utrinque Ostia Ductuum Salivalium Inferio-

rum, Warthoniam nempe 6c Noftrt, quorum locum sub Lingua desig-nant extremitates Stylorum aaaa y per dicta Ostia exeuntium sub Lingua b tquae hic paulisper revulsa cernitur a Maxilla inferiori c, ut singula rectiuspateant.

XXIII. jiccounts of Books and jidditions omitted.

>'■ ii- P- 397'

" -?■ t- 5 / 3 -

64.. p. 208l.

i - A Natome Medullae Spinalis, & Nervorum inde provenientium; Gerardt_L\. Blaßt- M. D.

a. Tetras Anatomicarum Epistolarum, Marcelli Malpighii & Caroli Fracaf-sati, de Lingua & Cerebro; Bononia.

«• -74 />• 1144'

«>5- f- ;r.

3. Franc. Jos. Burrbi Epistolae duae ad Thomam Bartholinum. Hafniae.1669. in 4 0 .

4. Raymundi Vteujjens, M. D. Mon/peliensis, Neurographia Universalis.Zwg</. 1685. in Fol.

5. The Anatomy of the Brain, containing its Mechanism and Physiology,together with some new Discoveries and Corrections of Ancient and ModernAuthors upon that Subject : To which is annex’d, a particular Account ofAnimal Functions and Muscular Motion ; by Hen. Rtdly. M. D.

6. Pathologice Cerebri & Nervosi Generis Specimen: In quo agitur deMorbis Convulsivis & Scorbuto; Studio Thoma IVtllss. M.D.

7. Antonii Molinetti Dissertationes Anatomicae & Pathologicae de Sensibus&t eorum Organis; Patavii. 1669. in4°.

8. Optbalmographia, sive Oculiejusque partium Descriptio Anatomica:”■ ’ 7! ' i’ 1,sg ’ Cui accelsit Nova Visionis Theoria, Regia Societati Lond. proposita, per Guil.Pb. coi. »i. e. p. Briggs. M.D. Editio altera. 1685. in 8°. TheTheory ofVißo », andtbecon-107 "147 p 171 ttnuationaf that Difcourje, ivere at firft inferted in thefe Papers in English-' But

the Aut bor, a feiv Tears aster, Tranflated them into Latin, and annex’d themto his Opthalmographia (in this Second Edition) to ivhich they properly be~long.

9. 1. A new Disovery toucbing Vision ; in an Epistleof theDiscovererM. V Abbe Mariotte. of Dyons to M- Ptcquet, and the Answer to it. TheSubßance of both is here inferted in English.

2. The Answer of M. Mariotte to M- Pecquet , about the Opinion thatthe Choroeides is the Principal Organ of Sight; Englified and infertedhere.

3. M. Mariotte of Vision.

4. Two Letters of M. Perault , and M. Mariotte ; concerning Vision.Paris. 1682.

10. Trahe de 1 ’ Organe de 1 ’ Ouie par. M. du Vernty. Paris, in 8°.

11. Gustus Organum, per Laurentium Belltni, novisti me deprehensum.

12. Ant. Nuck de Ductu Salivali novo, Saliva, Ductibus Aquosi.«, Sc

Humore Aqueo, Lugd Bat - 1686. Chap.

p. 600.

" 67- p. 13 J 9 -

77.119. p. 746.

n. 37. p. 66 S.

77.59 p • 1043.

1.74. U17-

17- I49. ^7. iCj.

'k>- r- '59-

*i. 20.

" '77 f. Ia+4-