4o 8 _ PHALARIDIS EPISTOLjE. Llb.Il. c.X,

CaroloBoylio in pnef. ad Epistolas, & Rieh. Bentlejo in diss de EpistolisPhalaridis §. 1 6 . Forte igitur sunt Adriani Sophista: sub M. Antonino Imp.clari, qvi testeSvida scripsit eVivoAa's, KoymimbstiQMiig, (paAapv. Phalari-dis certe ipsius esse ut dubitem, facit prteter silentium antiqviorum scripto-rum, & dialectum Epistolarum, qvae contra moremSiculorum illius aetatisAttica est,nonDorica jmentioThericleorum* poculorum,aliacp argumen-ta a Clarissimo Bentlejo producta in dissertatione de Phalaridis EpistolisqvamAnglice scripsit ad Gvil.WottonumLond.i697.8 v ° ejus(p erudita A-pologia adverlusCarolumBoyliumibid.1699.8 vo paginar.5-49.Neq3 viden-tur ex animo refragari huic sententias vel ipse Boylius vel hujus Hyperalpi-stx, qvibus per varios qvosAnglico idiomate emiserunt libellos magis nifallor cordi fuit,adversario luo aegre facere**qvamPhalaridiEpistolas vindi*care.Bentlejum vero advers 9 se armaverat editorEpistolaru,qvod in praefa-tione

*Epist.70. In transcursu obversa qvod Phalarin pro qvolibet tyranno ponit Hyginus fab,537. ubi vide notas Tho, Munckcri. Sic Derpanius Pacatusc. 29. panegyrici. Cicero inPisonem C. 50. te non Aristarchum sed Phalarin Grammaticum haben, m. Vide&Lucian.2. de vera historia T. i.p. 678. ApologiamPhalaridis scripserunt prteter eundem Lucia-num in duabus Orationibus T. 1. p.731, seq. Mathaus Boflm adversus Benedictum Cal-dium & Andrem Arnaldtts , cujus scriptum exstat in Casp. Dorn avii Amphitheatro sapien-ti« Socratica: jocoseriatT.2. p.i 8. Vide eleganti stimi Badii Lex. in Boßus (C) & Epicure, (L)i** Titulus libri Boylianiesl; Dr.Bentley's dißertauons on the Epißles of Phalaris and thefables of Aifip, examined , by the honourable CharlesBoyle Sffie Lond. 1699. tertia edi-tio paginar. 266. gvo. Excajteris scriptis qvte circa hanc controversiam incredibili con-tentione animorum agitatam viderunt lucem sine nomine auctoris, hxcadmanusmeaspervenerunt; A fiefS of the dissertatione upon the Epißles of Phalaris. Lond. 1698.8.paginar. 78. Ex ipso litigantium testimorsir auctor qviqvis est doce nihil incertius esteChronologie« hisce qvas tractent controversiis. Ab eo tempore prodiit: Afhort nbieSSef the controierß betden A 1r, Boyle and Dr. Bentley 1701. 8vo. paginar. >p8. Verumauctor libelli qvi inscribitur: Sffay concerning Critical and curious Irarnwg > in fibhichare containedfime fhort refletiions on the ControScrfie,&c, by T, R, Effie. Lond. 1 698.paginar. 77. ita acerbe perstringit Wottonum &: Bentlejum, ut nec Boylio parcat nec cu-mulatislimo laude viro H. Aldrichio. Ad risum ciendum compositus est alius qvi inferi-bitur: X. Dialog9es of the Dead, relating to the prefint controSer/y concerning ileEpißles of Phalaris , by the author of the journey to London 1699. 8, paginar. 8Z. subBentivoli nomine insultat Bentlejo ejusqve argumenta ridet. Inde lucem vidit aliudscriptum magis serium sub titulo: A fhort accuont of Dr.Bentley s humanity and Jußt -ce tho thofi Authors SSko haSe dritten befor e bim , Giith an honefl Sindication of Tho,Stanley Ssfiire and his notes on Callimachus, to dich isadded an appendix by the Book-feller Tho. Bennet. Lond. 1699. gvo. pag.140. De hoc dixi infra libro 111 . in Callimacho,c. 19. p. 48r Tangit qvoqve hanc controversiam sed joco magis qvam ferio liber cuititulus : a fall and tne account of de bittel fought laß friday betdeen the aucient andthe modern books in St, James libraty. Lond, 17 04. 8, ad calcem libri qvi i nscribitur; 4tale of a tub.