Jic,

:tcc

LECTURE XXII

epfe

mici

>P - • 1 r ' • - : -

inca;on 2 •

CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THEiere l; STYLE IN N\ 413. OF THE SPEC-uedfe TAT OR.

a fci:

ht'di rr^

him . cc JL HOUGH in yeflerday’s Paper we confideredado: “ how every thing that is great, new or beauti-itpn “ ful, is apt to affect the imagination with plea-ami “ fure, we muft own , that it is impoffible for: jj “ us to affign the neceffary caufe of this pleafure;jothe “ becaufe we know neither the nature of analjk “ idea, nor the fubftance of a human foul, whichujp. “ might help us to difeover the conformity orjo},“ difagreeablenefs of the one to the other; and,pgj. “ therefore, for want of fuch alight, all thati (,{]], “ we can do in fpeculations of this kind, is, to“ reflect on thofe operations of the foul that<c are mod agreeable, and to range, under“ their proper heads, w'hatis pleafing or difpleaf-cc ing to the mind, without being able to tracea out the feveral neceffary and efficient caufes“ from whence the pleafure or difpleafure arifes.This Sentence, confidered as an introductoryone, muff be acknowledged to be very faulty.An introductory Sentence ihould never contain

L e c T.XXII.